Showing posts with label budget deficits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label budget deficits. Show all posts

Monday, June 28, 2010

The Prez vs The Strawman: Round 4

He used this strategy to argue for the passage of: the stimulus, health care deform, the pending financial over-regulation and now for his pledge to address our record budget deficits. President Obama has declared war on the strawman. You see, in our president's mind, if you don't support his vision for what's good for our nation, you don't support doing anything at all and you best just "get out of the way".

Over the weekend in Toronto:

President Obama on controlling the debt: "Somehow people say, why are you doing that, I'm not sure that's good politics. I'm doing it because I said I was going to do it and I think it's the right thing to do. People should learn that lesson about me because next year when I start presenting some very difficult choices to the country, I hope some of these folks who are hollering about deficits and debt step-up because I'm calling their bluff. We'll see how much of that, how much of the political arguments that they're making right now are real and how much of it was just politics."


Forget for a moment that President Obama was actually pushing the other G20 members to increase deficit spending, not pledge to actually cut budgets. The Wall Street Journal recaps the action:

The meeting's concluding statement, a compromise between two competing visions of the international economy, masked divisions between the U.S. and Europe evident in the run-up to the summit. The U.S. has warned that moving too fast to cut deficits and reduce stimulus spending could risk another global recession. European nations, especially Germany, have cautioned that moving too slowly could produce unsustainable debt loads, higher interest rates and even defaults.


and

Germany, which has held itself out as the champion of austerity, took some potshots. German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble used an interview in the French newspaper Le Monde to throw a jab at the U.S., saying Mr. Obama's giant stimulus spending has had little impact on the country's jobless rate, which remains well above 9%.


It was Angela Merkel's vision that carried the day, not President Obama's. After being bested by Iron Angie our president picked a fight with a much easier opponent: the strawman. If you watched professional wrestling in the early 80's you will no doubt remember the personification of our president's dream villian. My brother and I never knew his name, to us he was simply the "albino in the powder blue trunks". Unlike your typical wresting match which was designed to be a back and forth affair with the hero usually emerging triumphant; the albino never seemed to land a punch, he was expected to take his "beating" and be pinned. The same thing goes for Obama's strawman. In the world of political theatre, he's created by the president's political shop and receives his beatdown via the bully pulpit. Because he's a fictional creation, the strawman can never win.

The only problem is that even a president isn't entitled to his own facts.

Heritage fellow Brian Riedl details:

Washington will spend $30,543 per household in 2010—$5,000 per household more than just two years ago. While some of this spending is a temporary result of the recession, President Obama’s latest budget would replace this temporary spending with permanent new programs. Consequently, by 2020—a time of assumed peace and prosperity—Washington would still spend nearly $36,000 per household, compared to $25,000 per household before this recession (adjusted for inflation).

There is a way out of this deficit nightmare: stop spending. If the federal government managed to return to the per-household spending level of the Reagan administration, the budget would be balanced by 2012 without any tax hikes. Too ambitious? Just returning to the per-household spending levels that existed before the current recession would balance the budget by 2019. There is a way to stop this spending nightmare. We just need the will.


The U.S. budget for the year 2000 was $2 trillion, for 2010 it's $4 trillion. Now, they haven't finished the census yet, but I'd be willing to wager that the population of our country didn't double. In short, the federal government doesn't have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem. The good news is that there's an intervention scheduled for Nov. 2.

America simply can't afford a government as big as President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid envision. Don't believe the president when he tells you that he's cut government to the bone and he simply has no choice but to raise taxes. Ignore the strawman that the president creates to confuse and confound you and look at the numbers, unlike our president they don't lie.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Pres. Obama's Debt Bomb

Yesterday President Obama unveiled his budget for fiscal year 2011 and it comes in at a whopping $3.8 trillion, running a deficit of $ 1.6 trillion. For those of you keeping score at home, this deficit is the largest in our nation's history, beating the previous record of $1.4 trillion set just last year. President Obama promised that he and the Democratic majorities in Congress were going to "bring real change" to Washington DC. In the first three years of his administration President Obama will increase our national debt by $4.4 trillion. Somehow, I don't think the American people had this kind of change in mind back in 2008, when candidate Obama promised to actually cut federal spending.


Right wing zealot Rush Limbaugh lost no time attacking our president's fiscal profligacy "By President Obama's own optimistic projections, American deficits will not return to what are widely considered sustainable levels over the next 10 years." Oh wait, that's from the New York Times.


What are the spending levels that has the Times so concerned? President Obama envisions growing government to the point that even after raising taxes by $2.3 trillion, federal spending will outstrip revenues by $8.5 trillion from 2011-2020. If Congress agrees to go along with the president's spending requests our national debt will be $18 trillion by 2020. The president has traded in his "spread the wealth" rhetoric for a policy of spreading debt to future generations of Americans. President Obama's agenda is a budget buster of epic proportions. The American people simply can't afford his vision for turning our country into a European-style social democracy.

In considering the president's proposed budget and what it means for our future. I hope you take a moment to reflect on these words from our fortieth president.

"This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves."

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Explaing the value added tax

This video takes an in depth look at what effects the VAT will have on our economy. Nancy Pelosi has already stated that a "VAT is on the table". The democratic program is to grow the government first and then find the money to pay for it later. The VAT is the only means to close the budget deficits they are creating. The only other option is to make your voices heard and prevent the democrats from growing the beast. Time is running out.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

House vote


Well enough arms have been twisted and midnight deals struck that the 1,200+ page behemoth cap and trade bill will be voted on by the House. This map is of projected budget deficits that will result from this bill for 2012. Remember, the whole idea of this bill is to make energy so expensive that we use less of it. In the real world, that means slower economic growth, fewer jobs created and everything you buy is going to cost you much more.
Just click on map to see budget numbers.